The “demands” of modern woman

[caption id="attachment_6414" align="aligncenter" width="500"] Fidus - Fruhlingsodem 1900[/caption]

“We can’t ask ourselves if woman is superior or inferior to man more than we can ask ourselves if water is superior or inferior to fire. Therefore, for each of the sexes the criterion of measurement cannot be given from the opposite sex, but exclusively from the “idea” of their own sex. The only thing that can be done is establish the superiority or the inferiority of a certain woman according to her being more or less near to the female typicity, to the pure or absolute women; and analogous thing also applies to man. The “demands” of modern woman derives from wrong ambitions, besides from a complex of inferiority – from the wrong idea that a woman as “only woman”, is inferior to man. Rightfully it has been said that feminism has not fought for the “rights of woman” but rather, without realizing it, for the right of woman to be the same as a man: a thing that, even if it were possible outside of the exterior practicistic-intellectual plane just said, would be equivalent for the right of woman to distort herself, to degenerate. The only qualitative criterion is, let us repeat, that of the degree of more or less perfect realization of its own nature. There is no doubt that a woman that is perfectly woman is superior to a man that is imperfectly man, in the same way as a peasant loyal to the land, who performs perfectly his functions, is superior to a king unable to perform his task”.

"Eros and the Mysteries of Love"
Giulio Cesare Andrea Evola