Tuesday, January 28, 2025

Machiavelli’s Comparison of Christianity & The Classical World

In considering, therefore, why all the peoples of ancient times were greater lovers of liberty than those of our own day, I believe this arises from the same cause that today makes men less strong, which I believe lies in the difference between our education and that of antiquity, based upon the difference between our religion and that of antiquity. 

For, while our religion has shown us truth and the true path, it also makes us place a lower value on worldly honour, whereas the pagans, who greatly valued honour and considered it the highest good, were more ferocious in their actions. 

[…]



The four functions of Myth

"Myth basically serves four functions. The first is the mystical function, realising what a wonder the universe is, and what a wonder you are, and experiencing awe before this mystery. The second is a cosmological dimension, the dimension with which science is concerned—showing you what shape the universe is, but showing it in such a way that the mystery again comes through. The third function is the sociological one—supporting and validating a certain social order. The fourth function is the pedagogical function, of how to live a human lifetime under any circumstances”

― Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth



Monday, January 27, 2025

No home in this world

“You are right, Steppenwolf, a thousand times right, and yet you must perish. You are far too demanding, too hungry for today’s straightforward, cosy world, satisfied as it is with so little. You have one dimension too many for its liking, so it will spit you out. It is impossible for anyone wishing to live and enjoy life in today’s world to be like you or me. It is no home, this fine world, for people like us who, instead of nonsensical noise, demand music; instead of pleasure, joy; instead of money, soul; instead of industrial production, genuine labour; instead of frivolity, genuine passion …”

Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf




Sunday, January 26, 2025

Destruction by Consent

Destruction by Consent

By P R Reddall

P R Reddall explores the voluntary embrace of evil and the power dynamics of consent, drawing from literary and mythological examples to highlight their relevance in personal and societal transformation.

One of the most sinister villains in popular horror is Count Dracula. He walks by night, has the ability to live forever, and he can shape-shift into a wolf, bat, large dog and even mist. He is frightfully charming but behind the intense, hypnotic gaze is a ravenous lust for blood.

If you enter his abode, beware. However, despite all his power, in order for him to enter your dwelling he must be invited in.

Living in his castle are three brides of Dracula. When the English solicitor Jonathan Harker visits the Count on business, he is told not to wander the hallways. Harker ignores the advice and finds himself in a room with the undead women. They do not attack, but use their sexuality to bring Harker willingly to his near downfall.

There was something about them that made me uneasy, some longing and at the same time some deadly fear. I felt in my heart a wicked, burning desire that they would kiss me with those red lips.

(Dracula, 1897, Bram Stoker)

We see through Bram Stoker’s literary example that embracing evil is a voluntary act.

Elsewhere there are other stories which corroborate this idea. In one radio drama I recall listening to on a winter’s night, a man was offered a deal by the devil whereby the devil was allowed to take one item from the man’s garden. Thinking that all he had in his garden was a solitary apple tree, the man agreed. Yet upon returning home he saw to his distress that his daughter was playing in the garden.

In the European myth, Loki is the god of trickery. Like any god he holds powers far greater than mortal man, yet his deeds involve subterfuge. He is not one to be worshipped, but there are certainly teachings which we can learn from.

Surely, between the Christian devil, the god Loki and the literary Count Dracula, they would hold the power to simply do whatever they wanted to mortal man? Yet it appears not. They rule by deceit and require us to take a voluntary step into their world.

Like all significant folk tales, such things are full of useful lessons which must be understood. The primary one which I would like to get across is that those who attempt to control us in this realm of existence are not all-powerful and rely on our consent.

I am not going to go into detail in regards to the law as this will vary considerably depending on where one lives; however, research will invariably uncover highly enlightening information which drives a wedge between what the powers that be want you to believe and what is actually true.

Furthermore, and of much greater importance is how we conduct our lives on a daily basis. Often we abide by an unwritten set of rules which have either been handed to us from parents, learned from popular media or concocted by ourselves and which are in fact totally incorrect. These ‘rules’ on what can or cannot be done often stem from fear. I am not talking about the traditional ideas which can aid us in leading a wholesome, healthy life, but the rules which unconsciously halt our achievements and slow our progress.

Just as progress in the gym is achieved by doing more repetitions than you thought you could manage, success in life can also be seen as pushing past fears and into new territory.

The plans clearly laid out by what may be called the ‘New World Order’ depend on compliance, but before we worry about what ‘they’ are trying to do to us, first concern yourself with the rules and regulations which you impose on yourself.

Not eating carbohydrates late in the evening is a very good rule, generally speaking, so if that is a rule of yours, then stick to it.

Not asking the most attractive girl you know out on a date is a very bad rule which comes from low self-worth. This may be related to how you take care of yourself physically but may also simply be negative self-talk and totally unfounded. Often the two go hand-in-hand.

Don’t put the pretty girl on a pedestal, out of reach, and while you’re at it, do not pedestalize your corrupt ‘world leaders’ either.

One excellent solution to both get the girl and remove Loki from the government is to get down the gym and lift.

As you perform every rep, say loudly, ‘I will not consent to my own destruction.’

Source

Saturday, January 25, 2025

A Good Principle

"I love my daughters more than my cousins, my cousins more than my neighbors, my neighbors more than strangers, and strangers more than enemies. Therefore, I love the French people more. I have that right. 

Then, I love Europeans more. And then, I love Westerners more. And then, among other countries, I love more those nations that are our allies and those that love our culture. 

That seems like a good principle. And I think that already gives us a lot of responsibilities, and that if we carry out those responsibilities, we will have done a very good job."

Jean-Marie Le Pen



Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Achieve the Grail

“In the great war, there is no room for the faint-hearted, the cowardly. A criminal or an anarchist will be better conditioned than a bourgeois, indecisive or cowardly man. They only need a push in the right direction. Only one who is born a hero has a place in our order. Only the Lord of Pure Will can march toward the end, breaking in the gates of the city of eternal life. Because will, through its perseverance, creates the thing it contemplates. Only the wild hordes of Odin and Parsifal will achieve the Grail.”

Miguel Serrano, Nos Book of the Resurrection



Tuesday, January 14, 2025

George Orwell on W. B. Yeats.

“Throughout most of his life, and long before Fascism was ever heard of, he had had the outlook of those who reach Fascism by the aristocratic route. He is a great hater of democracy, of the modern world, science, machinery, the concept of progress—above all, of the idea of human equality.”

George Orwell on W. B. Yeats.



Sunday, January 12, 2025

Submission to law

The submission to law: oh,  with what qualms of conscience was it that the noble races throughout the world renounced the vendettaand gave the law power over themselves! Law was long a vetitum, a blasphemy, an innovation; it was introduced with force like a force, to which men only submitted with a sense of personal shame. Every tiny step forward in the world was formerly made at the cost of mental and physical torture. 

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE



Thursday, January 9, 2025

A Reconstructive Revolution

"Fascism appears to us as a reconstructive revolution, in its affirmation, in opposition to both communist internationalism and to the democratic and demagogic notion of nation, of an aristocratic and spiritual concept of the nation itself."

- Julius Evola



Wednesday, January 8, 2025

Elwood Alfred Towner (1897-1954), Native Americans and National Socialism

Elwood Alfred Towner (1897-1954), famously known as 'Chief Red Cloud', was a native American supporter of Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. He was also a staunch fighter for Native American rights and a friend of the German American Bund during the 1930s/40s. In the 1930s he visited many schools and lecture halls in a variety of different places, educating listeners on the plight of the Native Americans and the dangers of communism. In one of his speeches he called the Jews 'chuck-na-gin', which he described as an American Indian term for 'children of the devil.' His fiery speeches rallied against the Jews, encouraged American Indians to unite with Germany against the Jews, and exposed the American president of being a Jew himself. Towner also proudly praised Adolf Hitler, calling him a spiritual brother and spoke about the spiritual connection he felt toward the Führer. In 1954, Chief Red Cloud, the Indian warrior of truth, passed away.


So yes, it is a well-known fact that National Socialist Germany was extremely sympathetic to the Native American plight. It is said that representatives, writers and propagandists from Germany talked of giving back expropriated land to the Indians and creating autonomous Indian states in America. Something that could only have happened with Adolf Hitler's help and a National Socialist victory. The Germans were interested in helping the plight of indigenous peoples in North and South America, hoping to incite an uprising by the “hemispheric Indian,” creating allies and instability in their search for world conquest.





Alternative History 2039

Native Americans and National Socialism — Chief Red Cloud & Chief New Moon


Jean-Marie Le Pen and Joan of Arc

Jean-Marie Le Pen and Joan of Arc

By Constantin von Hoffmeister 

Jean-Marie Le Pen, gone at 96, will not rest in peace because peace never suited him. France, that twisted lover, a nation forever at war with her own skin, has buried him, the man who refused to bow to the new gods of “progress” and sameness. He snarled at the polite lies of modernity, tore through the lies like a wolf through silk. “We do not hate the Turks; we love them, but in their country,” he said, pulling the ghosts of old Europe out of their graves, his words a jagged blade. And Joan of Arc, centuries dead, heard him. She rose from her pyre, her armor scorched but shining. Joan loved the English — but only in their country. “I do love them,” she told her judges, her enemies, “but I love France more.” This is where Le Pen and Joan meet: in their refusal to kneel, in their love for something greater than themselves.

Joan, sixteen and feral, heard voices in the fields of Domrémy, herding sheep under a sky that bled holy light. Saints spoke to her — Michael, Catherine, Margaret — telling her to save France, to drive the English out, to crown Charles at Reims. She was not polite about it. She demanded an army, and she got one. Imagine her, a girl dressed as a boy, cutting through soldiers with a sword she claimed was from God. The enemy called her a witch, a whore, an abomination. France called her a savior. Le Pen was not guided by angels. He had his own visions. France, to him, was a woman bleeding out, her body pierced by the swords of globalization, immigration, and cultural decay. He was not gentle about it either. He did not save his France with a sword but with words — sharp, direct, unapologetic words.

Le Pen came out of the rubble of post-war France, a country broken and ashamed. Born in Brittany in 1928, he grew up with the humiliation of Vichy and the weight of a France that had lost her way. He joined the Foreign Legion, fought in Indochina and Algeria, wars that burned into him the belief that France was under siege. Not just by armies but by ideologies, by the creeping shadows of global homogenization. He was a soldier without a battlefield, so he made his own. The National Front, founded in 1972, became his weapon, his crusade. He spoke for the forgotten, the silenced, the angry. He called out the elites, the “colonizers of Brussels,” and the technocrats who, he believed, sold France’s soul for a seat at the globalist table. He wanted a pure France, a France of villages and cathedrals, not mosques and shopping malls. Joan would have understood.

Joan’s trial was hell, a circus of enemies eager to break her. The English hated her because she had humiliated them on the battlefield. The French Church hated her because she bypassed its authority. Her gender, her visions, her victories — they were too much for her time. She stood before her judges, unbroken, answering their traps with sharp, unyielding logic. They burned her anyway. Her ashes were scattered in the Seine, as if her fire could be extinguished. Le Pen was not burned, but he was tried again and again — in the courts, in the media, in the salons of Paris. They called him a racist, a xenophobe, a fascist. His words scorched; his sentences turned to fire. He never recanted. Like Joan, he refused to betray his mission.

Joan’s France was sacred, a kingdom ordained by God, her rivers and fields blessed by holy blood. Le Pen’s France was cultural, historical, a land of poets and farmers, of medieval spires and stubborn pride. He did not claim divine revelations. His message carried its own fervor. France, for him, was not just a place. She was a soulful woman who needed to be defended. He fought for her as Joan had fought centuries before, although their battles were different. Joan faced the swords and arrows of the English; Le Pen faced lawsuits, protests, and the scorn of a globalized world. Both stood their ground, defiant in the face of their enemies.

Joan rode into Orléans like a storm, her banner raised high, her soldiers roaring her name. The city was liberated; the tide of the war turned. She marched to Reims and crowned Charles VII, fulfilling her divine mission. But victory made her enemies more determined. When she was captured by the Burgundians and sold to the English, they sought to destroy her body as well as her spirit. Le Pen’s victories were not on the battlefield. They were in the polls. In 2002, he shocked France by reaching the second round of the presidential election, a moment that sent shockwaves through the establishment. His enemies tried to destroy him, but each trial only strengthened his legend among his followers.

Joan was declared innocent decades after her death, her name restored, her sainthood eventually secured. The Church canonized her in 1920, making her a symbol of French unity and faith. Le Pen, of course, will never be declared a saint. His legacy is tangled, controversial, loved and loathed in equal measure. But he did not need the Church’s approval. His sainthood, if it exists, lives in the hearts of his supporters, the millions who saw in him a defender of France. His daughter, Marine Le Pen, carries his banner now, softer in tone but carrying the same message: France must remain French. “I love them in their country,” Joan said. Jean-Marie Le Pen said after her: “We do not hate them; we love them, but in their country.”

Joan and Le Pen both understood the power of symbols. Joan’s banner, painted with the names of Jesus and Mary, led soldiers into battle, a visual manifestation of her divine mission. Le Pen invoked Joan as a symbol of nationalism, a saint who fought for France against foreign domination. Critics sneered, calling it opportunistic. For Le Pen’s followers, it was a spiritual connection: the maid of Orléans and the man from Brittany, both warriors for the glory of France. One wielded a sword, the other wielded words — both were willing to fight.

Le Pen was not loved by history, and neither was Joan, at least not in their lifetimes. Joan was burned alive, her ashes scattered to the wind. Le Pen was burned metaphorically, his reputation shredded, his words twisted, his image vilified. But history has a way of changing its mind. Joan became a saint, her story rewritten into a tale of heroism and faith. Le Pen’s story is not finished; his daughter’s rise and the continuing strength of the National Rally suggest that his ideal France might yet find its place.

Le Pen’s death marks the end of an era, but his legacy is alive, restless, and defiant. The National Rally, now rebranded but carrying the same fire, continues to rise. For his supporters, Le Pen was a politician and a prophet, a man who saw the dangers of globalization and the loss of identity long before others did. For his detractors, he will always be a demagogue, a voice of “hate.” But like Joan, Le Pen will not be forgotten. Both remain symbols of a France that refuses to bow, a France that fights for her soul.

The King is dead. Long live the King!



Source



Tuesday, January 7, 2025

A Model Nation

"It is therefore evident that a nation affirming a hierarchical civilization that does not recognize the separation of the human from the divine, is naturally moral, even ignoring the same terms of morality: its existence is the law of itself, hence it consciously creates its own life, gives soul and form to its nation, making it a “model” nation."

— La Razza di Roma, by Massimo Scaligero



Thursday, January 2, 2025

Into Perpetual Conflict

"The natural world is a world of war; the natural man is a warrior; the natural law is tooth and claw. All else is error. A condition of combat everywhere exists. We are born into perpetual conflict. It is our inheritance, even as it was the heritage of previous generations."

Ragnar Redbeard, Might is Right